BIOGRAPHY

BLOG

THEATER

SUPPORT
Democratic Candidates and Organizations in Southern Oregon and Beyond


Get Firefox!

Archives

08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009

 D O T Y B L O G    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?  Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Fair and Balanced Discussion from Southern Oregon

Monday, April 18, 2005

In response 

This is submitted to the Mail Tribune, in response to a letter in today's edition.
Not to draw to fine a point on it, but the "activist judges" who were behind the "recent spate of homosexual marriages" Lary Stieglitz writes about were the Mayors of San Francisco, CA and New Platz, NY and the Multnomah County Commission. The “activist judge” label is to make us believe unaccountable, appointed-for-life people are making decisions about our laws, in contravention to the way things are supposed to work. But many gay marriage court decisions are coming from ELECTED (and thus accountable) state judges, and the major gay marriage events in recent years have been authorized by the relevant jurisdictions’ elected Executive Branch, not judges.

Amazingly, making decisions about our laws is EXACTLY the job description of judges - including deciding that a law is flawed.

The “activist judge” in the Schiavo case, which Stieglitz also cites, was honoring the sanctity of marriage - recognizing centuries of tradition and law that hold that relationship and guardianship of an incapacitated person belongs primarily and at times exclusively to the spouse. The decisions were NOT ordering the death of a woman; they were acknowledging that a husband has the right to decide an issue personal to an incapacitated wife.

I have always believed arguments more persuasive when accurate. I’d hate to think Americans were whipping up a hatred of the Judiciary by holding it to blame for hot-button issues and not have the facts right. Keep that in mind when encouraging Senators to protect the rights of half the nation.


John Doty, Medford
Now I don't know if it will be published - we shall see. Meantime - I urge anyone who looks at my blog to contact their Republican Senators (we have one here in Oregon) and urge them to support the rights of the minority in addressing irrevocable lifetime appointments, and NOT dismantle the fillibuster.

|